My algo has a 1.70 Sharpe after 84 days live — but 0 copiers. Sharing the full equity curve so someone can tell me what I'm doing wrong

I've been quietly operating a spot algo on Binance since early March — real cash, no paper trading — and after 84 days I'm making an attempt to know why I have zero copiers regardless of metrics that I assumed would stand out. Posting the complete screenshot because I genuinely want feedback, not validation.

The technique is a dynamic ATR grid with a circuit breaker that routinely halts new buy orders throughout sharp drops to protect capital. Hosted on AWS Tokyo for latency reasons.

90-day stay results:
– ROI: +16.39% (PnL: +$84.83)
– Sharpe Ratio: 1.70
– Max Drawdown: 13.11%
– Win Price: 79.52% — 66 of 84 days inexperienced

The thing I discover most fascinating in that equity curve is the March–April period. You'll be able to see the drawdown line spike when the market dropped, then the bot paused buys, and it recovered to new highs by late Might with none guide intervention. The circuit breaker did exactly what it was designed to do.

For context: a Sharpe of 1.0 is extensively thought-about "good" for an lively strategy. Most retail algo traders I see posting listed here are proud of 0.7–0.9 on backtests. That is 1.70 on a stay account with actual slippage and costs.

And but — Binance's copy buying and selling algorithm buries me as a result of my lead stability is ~$618. Merchants with $50okay–$100okay and visibly worse drawdowns are featured above me.

Two things I'm genuinely not sure about:
1. Is there a method to make risk-adjusted metrics extra seen to potential copiers on platforms like this, or is it purely a capital signaling recreation?
2. Taking a look at my fairness curve — is there anything that may make you personally hesitant to repeat this, that I'm not seeing from the inside?

Respect trustworthy takes.